What About Prophecy and End Times?

Why This Matters So Much

If you grew up in certain evangelical traditions, you may have absorbed a specific narrative about Israel and the end times:

• Israel's return to the land in 1948 was prophetic fulfillment
• The nation of Israel plays a central role in end-times events
• Christians who oppose Israel may be "fighting against God"
• Supporting Israel is eschatologically necessary: it's part of God's plan

This framework makes the stakes feel cosmic. It's not just about politics or ethics; it's about being on the right side of history, the right side of prophecy, the right side of God Himself.

We understand why this feels so important. And we want to engage it seriously, not dismiss it.

How Did We Get This Framework?

The prophetic system many American evangelicals have absorbed is called dispensationalism. It was developed in the 1830s by John Nelson Darby and popularized through:

• The Scofield Reference Bible (1909)
• Hal Lindsey's "The Late Great Planet Earth" (1970)
• The "Left Behind" novels (1995-2007)
• Countless prophecy conferences and TV preachers

This system makes a sharp distinction between Israel and the Church as two separate peoples with two separate destinies. It teaches that God's promises to Israel are separate from His purposes for the Church.

How Did the Apostles Read Prophecy?

Here's what's striking: when you read how Jesus and the apostles actually interpret Old Testament prophecy, it looks quite different from the dispensationalist framework.

Peter at Pentecost

When Peter preaches at Pentecost, he quotes Joel's prophecy about the "last days" and says:

Peter sees Pentecost (the pouring out of the Spirit on believers from all nations) as the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy. Not a future political restoration, but a present spiritual reality.

James at the Jerusalem Council

When the early church debates whether Gentiles can be included, James quotes Amos's prophecy about rebuilding "David's fallen tent" and applies it to:

The "rebuilding" Amos prophesied is happening through the inclusion of Gentiles in God's people, not through political nationalism.

Paul on the "Israel of God"

Paul repeatedly redefines who "Israel" is in light of Christ:

The Author of Hebrews on the "Better Country"

The patriarchs weren't ultimately looking for a Middle Eastern territory. They were looking for the heavenly city, the new creation.

But What About Romans 11?

The strongest case for ongoing prophetic purposes for ethnic Israel comes from Romans 11. Paul does say that "all Israel will be saved" and that God's gifts and calling are "irrevocable."

We take this seriously. Here's what we'd note:

What Romans 11 Affirms

• God still loves the Jewish people
• God hasn't abandoned His purposes for ethnic Israel
• There's mystery here that calls for humility

What Romans 11 Does NOT Say

• That the modern nation-state IS the Israel Paul is describing
• That Christians must support Israeli government policies
• That Israel is exempt from moral accountability
• That we should "help along" prophetic fulfillment through political action

Even granting the strongest reading of Romans 11, it says nothing about what our political stance should be toward a modern government.

The Danger of "Prophecy Engineering"

There's a troubling tendency in some prophetic frameworks to try to "help along" God's plan through political action. This can lead to:

• Supporting policies not because they're just, but because they seem "prophetically necessary"
• Ignoring suffering because it's "part of God's plan"
• Treating moral questions as already settled by prophetic charts
• Assuming that what happens must be what God wanted to happen

Jesus explicitly told His disciples not to concern themselves with prophetic timelines:

Notice: Jesus redirects them from prophetic speculation to present faithfulness. That's our calling too.

What This Means for Us

Here's where we land:

We Can Hold Eschatology Loosely

Faithful Christians disagree about end-times frameworks. Dispensationalists, covenant theologians, amillennialists, premillennialists: all have tried to honor Scripture. This isn't a salvation issue. We can disagree here and still be brothers and sisters in Christ.

Prophecy Doesn't Override Ethics

Whatever your eschatology, it doesn't give any nation a pass on biblical standards of justice. Even if you believe God has future purposes for Israel, that doesn't mean Christians should support injustice now. God's sovereignty doesn't cancel human moral responsibility.

Our Job Is Present Faithfulness

We're not called to decode prophetic timelines or engineer eschatological outcomes. We're called to:

• Love our neighbors (all of them)
• Speak truth
• Pursue justice
• Work for peace
• Trust God with the timeline

What We're Confident About, and What We Hold Loosely

We're Confident

• Prophecy doesn't override ethics. No eschatological framework exempts any nation from God's standards of justice.
• The apostles read prophecy as fulfilled in Christ. This is the consistent pattern across the New Testament.
• Our job is present faithfulness, not prophetic engineering. Jesus told us so directly.

We Hold Loosely

• The exact meaning of "all Israel will be saved." Romans 11 has puzzled interpreters for centuries.
• Whether there's a distinct future for ethnic Israel. Faithful Christians disagree here.
• Specific end-times timelines. Jesus told us not to worry about this.